Ellis Richard E. (EN). McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) has long been recognized to be one of the most significant decisions ever handed down by the United States Supreme Court.
Ellis Richard E. Indeed, many scholars have argued it is the greatest opinion handed down by the greatest Chief Justice, in which he declared the act creating the Second Bank of the United States constitutional and Marylands attempt to tax it unconstitutional. Although it is now recognized as the foundational statement for a strong and active federal government, the immediate impact of the ruling was short-lived and widely criticized.
Richard E. Ellis is Professor of History at the University of Buffalo, SUNY. Among his published works are The Jeffersonian Crisis: Courts and Politics in the Young Republic (1971) and The Union at Risk: Jacksonian Democracy, State's Rights, and the Nullification Crisis (1987). He has held grants from The John Simon Guggenheim Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the American Council of Learned Societies.
The book also examines the relationship between McCulloch v. Maryland and the creation of a federal program of internal improvements. Do you want to read the rest of this article? Request full-text.
It sheds new light on how the case came before the US Supreme Court. The book also examines the relationship between McCulloch v. Maryland and the creation of a federal program of. .This book examines the public debate that took place over Chief Justice John Marshall's famous decision in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
The book also examines the relationship between McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). It sheds new light on how the case came before the US Supreme Court. It also examines many of the key issues involved in the case that John Marshall either slighted or totally ignored: the private profit-making nature of the Second Bank of the United States (2 BUS); the power of the 2 BUS to create branches in the states without their consent, which many people viewed as a direct assault upon the sovereignty.
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 . 316 (1819), was a . Ellis, Richard (2007). Aggressive Nationalism: McCulloch v. Maryland and the Foundation of Federal Authority in the Young Republic. Supreme Court decision that defined the scope of the . Congress's legislative power and how it relates to the powers of American state legislatures.
Ellis at 149 (identifying Hammond as "the leading figure among the antibank forces" in Ohio). Oxford University Press.
Ellis argues that Marshall's "aggressive nationalism" was ultimately counter-productive: his overreaching led to.
Ellis argues that Marshall's "aggressive nationalism" was ultimately counter-productive: his overreaching led to Jackson's democratic rejection of the decision and failed to reconcile states' rights to the effective operation of the institutions of federal governance. Elegantly written, full of new information, and the first in-depth examination of McCulloch v. Maryland, Aggressive Nationalism.